Essay Prompts

Essay Prompt: in a 1200-1500 word essay, use a text we read for this class to better understand an object you encountered on your tour of the MFA Boston (or vice-versa).

What I'm Looking For
This essay assignment invites you to connect a work of art at Boston’s MFA with one of the texts we read in the first half of the semester. This combination of sources will require you to use two different modes of close analysis, visual and literary.

Two Sources? So this is a compare and contrast essay?

No. I’m looking for a “deepening digression” essay. A compare and contrast essay is interested in both sources equally. But in this essay I want the two sources to play different roles: Source A is the main event, while Source B serves merely as a tool—as a lens used to bring Source A into focus.

Which source should play which role?

It depends. Think about which source strikes you as strange, as needing to be explained and brought into better focus. Use that as Source A, and relegate the other to serve as analytical tool. But only if that second source really does give you at least a glimmer of a better grasp of the first one. If there’s no special “spark” when you bring the two sources together, maybe you need a different pair of sources.

So choosing the right pair of sources can be challenging?

Yes! Don’t choose your sources casually. Doing some preliminary thinking at the outset is vital to writing any paper—not just this one!

Essay Structure
  • Title: Use the title to signal both the topic and your unique take on it. One way to do this is with a “Title: Subtitle” structure, where the subtitle defines the topic, whereas the title signals your particular take on that topic.
  • Introduction: Use the the introduction to accomplish three vital tasks:
    • Orient the reader to your “main event” source. Is it famous, a work most people have heard of, so you only need to remind us about it? Or is it something abstruse, so you need to start by engaging our interest?
    • Voice a preliminary understanding of the “main event” source. What’s obvious? What’s puzzling about it?
    • Voice your essay’s mission: roughly speaking, you plan to draw on source B (name or describe it) to better understand source A. Ideally, end the intro ¶ with the deeper understanding that you plan to argue. A genuine thesis claim is always better than a mere promise of insights to come. If necessary, leave us with a promise for now, but come back and rewrite your thesis claim once you’ve finished the essay and you know what you actually conclude.
  • Early Body ¶s: Use the first one or even two body ¶s to flesh out the preliminary understanding, thus making sure your reader is “up to speed” on the basics of Source A. Do the obvious stuff first, and try to end this section with a focus on what’s odd or puzzling about Source A. (That puzzlement is vital: it will serve to motivate the digression into Source B at the start of the next section.)
  • Digression ¶s: Use one or two ¶s to briefly give an account of Source B. Focus on details and qualities that “rhyme” with the qualities you were discussing in Source A. Remember, this isn’t really an essay about Source B: focus your account on what matters in your quest to better understand Source A. At the same time, don’t anticipate what you plan to say in the final section: limit your discussion to facts and details from Source B, with nary a mention of source A. Aim to end this section with a focus on the KEY from source B that (in the next section) will unlock the puzzle of Source A.
  • Final Body ¶s: Return to source A with a bang, announcing how some detail or insight from Source B solves the puzzle of Source A. Flesh out the implications of this analysis, and you’re all done—except for the conclusion.
  • Conclusion: What have you accomplished? Beyond merely restating your thesis claim, what are the larger implications of your analysis? How does seeing Source A in the larger context of Source B deepen our grasp of the culture(s) that produced them?
Sources
Sources allowed and not allowed: The purpose of this essay is to measure your skills as a reader and NOT as a researcher. Don’t turn to Google, Wikipedia or Chat-GPT for insight. Feel free to draw on class notes, HW posts, and scholars I assigned as reading. In the end, though, this is the sort of essay in which the real answers turn out to be hidden in the details of the primary source: read it, quote it, ponder it—and turn it into evidence.

Source citation: Use MLA style for source citation. This means parenthetical citations to signal the use of ideas or information and NOT just for citing quotations. Keep the parenthetic citation short: just a last name and page or line reference (in cases where the author is unknown, like Gilgamesh, give the title rather than the author, followed by a page or line ref). Then, in a list of Works Cited at the essay’s end, provide a list of the sources your cited, alphabetized by author last name—or title in the case of Gilgamesh.

Include a photo
Include at least one image you took of the object. Strong preference for photographs you took yourself. Either way, be sure to credit the photographer, whether yourself or someone else.

Course Description

This course examines key figures and works in literary and artistic traditions from the Ancient and Classical periods through the Middle Ages and Renaissance, concluding with the Enlightenment and Romanticism. Throughout the semester we will explore how art expresses cultural ideals and social hierarchies, as well as how evolving aesthetic standards have shaped conventions in literature and the arts. Coursework and assignments include learning trips to various sites of historical and cultural significance in and around the Boston area to emphasize the Humanities’ relevance beyond the classroom. This course fulfills a single unit in each of the following BU Hub areas: Aesthetic Exploration, Historical Consciousness, Critical Thinking.

Course Rules

Plagiarism is a very serious offense in this course, at CGS, and in the wider BU community. If you’re short on time, better that you ask for an extension than fail the assignment or (worse) get suspended.

Generative AI is not permitted. Honing your creative, analytical, and critical thinking skills is one of the learning outcomes of HU103, and developing strong competencies in these areas will prepare you for a competitive workplace. Students may not use ChatGPT, Grammarly Pro, translation software, or any other AI language generating programs for any part of class work—unless explicitly directed by a Professor for research purposes. Students may not use these programs to write and/or edit assignments, or to summarize readings. Therefore, students must be the sole authors of assignments they turn in for this class and must take responsibility for the information and ideas contained in their work. In practice, authorship means understanding the implications of your words and being able to explain your reasoning. It also means having read sources you cite and being able to talk intelligently about them. Students should be prepared to discuss their submitted work and their sources in detail.

Respect me and your fellow students during class. Keep your laptop closed and your eyes on whoever’s talking—or on the text we’re talking about. Focus on people are saying and join in the discussion with insights or questions of your own.

Attendance will be taken at every lecture and discussion section. If you know that you’re going to miss a class meeting, please let me know—I always appreciate a heads-up! Accruing more than three absences during the semester will affect your final grade for the course. A student with five or more absences risks failing the course, even if all other course requirements have been satisfied.

Course Materials

Available at the BU Bookstore (link to purchase):

  • The Epic of Gilgamesh, tr. Gerald Davis. Pub: CreateSpace.
  • Euripedes, Medea, tr. Robertson. Pub: Free Press.
  • Plato, Symposium, tr. Nehamas. Pub: Hackett.
  • William Shakespeare, The Tempest, Signet Classics edition.
  • Voltaire, Candide, tr. Bair. Pub: Penguin Random House.
  • Carol Strickland, The Annotated Mona Lisa, Pub: Andrews McMeel, 3d Ed.

Additional readings will be posted on on the course Blackboard page.

HUB Capacities

Humanities 103 is designed to achieve the following learning outcomes, per the BU HUB.

Aesthetic Exploration:

  1. By surveying more than two millennia of art and literature, this course introduces students to various modes of aesthetic exploration.  In their homework, essays and exams, students will demonstrate both knowledge and appreciation of notable works of art and literature, including the cultural contexts in which those works were created, and will ponder their ongoing relevance.
  2. Through tests, written assignments, and in-class discussions, students will demonstrate the reasoning skills and vocabulary necessary to interpret works of art and literature.
  3. In class discussion and in their written work, students will evaluate and analyze a wide range of genres, modes and styles: epic, tragic, lyric and satiric literature; religious, allegorical and mimetic representation; and visual media from sculpture to painting to film.

Historical Consciousness:

  1. Students will learn to understand and evaluate artworks in their respective historical and cultural contexts. They will learn to use historical evidence in evaluating interpretations of artworks.
  2. Through exams, writing assignments, and in-class discussions, students will demonstrate an ability to interpret primary source material (textual, visual, or aural) using a range of interpretive skills and situating the material in its historical and cultural context.
  3. In surveying specific periods in the history of literature and the arts, students will demonstrate knowledge of various philosophical and religious traditions, intellectual paradigms, forms of political organization, and socio-economic forces.  They will thereby learn how these have changed over time.

Critical Thinking:

  1. Students will be able to analyze various forms of argumentation and interpretation when learning to understand and evaluate artworks.  They will identify key elements of critical thinking, including habits of distinguishing deductive from inductive modes of inference and recognizing common logical fallacies and cognitive biases. Students will learn to distinguish empirical claims about matters of fact from normative or evaluative judgments.  Students will learn to apply theories and principles in interpreting and evaluating various artworks.
  2. Drawing on skills developed in class, students will be able to evaluate the validity of arguments and interpretations, including their own.  Students will learn key concepts that cultivate critical thinking and rational discourse.  They will also recognize the ways in which thinking about art may be shaped by values, moral character, and emotional responses.